Análise Socio-Retórica do uso de 1Enoque em Judas 14-16
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35319/yachay.202480151Palabras clave:
Judas, Enoc, Análisis Socio-Retótico, Parusía, Teología BíblicaResumen
Este artículo tiene como objetivo analizar la cita que Judas 14-16 hace de 1Enoc 1:9, utilizando el Análisis Socio-Retórico del NT. El estudio aborda inicialmente la evolución del método de Análisis Retórico, desde la Reforma Protestante hasta los esfuerzos de Betz y Kennedy, para luego presentar la metodología propuesta por Witherington III y elegida para este artículo, el Análisis Socio-Retórico del NT. A continuación, se presentan las traducciones de Judas 14-16 y 1Enoc 1,9, junto con notas de traducción y crítica textual del texto de Judas. La investigación también examina la autoría, datación y contexto social de la carta de Judas y el Libro de 1Enoc, contextualizando la perícopa de 1 En 1,9. Los resultados del análisis muestran que Judas emplea la retórica greco-romana de injuria, integrando contenidos judaicos, como 1Enoc 1,9, para construir un argumento contra los “impíos” y fortalecer la cohesión interna de los “amados”. Judas adapta el texto de 1Enoc para mostrar que los “impíos” serán juzgados en la Parusía de Jesús, buscando convencer a sus lectores de aliarse con él contra los “impíos” y tranquilizar a los seguidores respecto al juicio divino venidero.
Descargas
Citas
ADEODATO, João Maurício. “Uma crítica retórica à retórica de Aristóteles”. Revista Brasileira de Estudos Políticos, v. 1, n. 110, p. 35-74, jan/jun, 2015.
ALAND, Kurt; ALAND, Barbara. O Texto do Novo Testamento: introdução às edições científicas do Novo Testamento Grego bem como à teoria e prática da moderna crítica textual. Barueri: SBB, 2013.
BAIRD, William (org.). History of New Testament Research: From C. H. Dood to Hans Dieter Betz. Vol. 3. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2013.
BAUCKHAM, Richard. Jude - 2 Peter: Word Biblical Commentary. Vol. 50. Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan, 1983.
BAUCKHAM, Richard. Jude and the Relatives of Jesus in the Early Church. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1990.
BAUER, Walter. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. 4rd Edition. Edited by Frederick William Danker. Chicago: University of Chicago, 2021. [BDAG]
BÍBLIA de Jerusalém. Nova ed. rev. e ampl. 2. impr. São Paulo: Paulus, 2003
BLACK, Matthew. (ed.). The Book of Enoch or 1 Enoch: a New English Edition. Studia in Veteris Testamenti Pseudepigrapha. Leiden: Brill, 1985.
BULTAMNN, Rudolf. Der Stil der paulinischen Predigt und die kynisch-stoische Diatribe. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 1910.
CHARLES, J. Daryl. “Polemic and Persuasion: Typological and Rhetorical Perspectives on the Letter of Jude”. En: WEBB, Robert L.; DAVIDS, Peter Hugh. (ed.) Reading Jude with new eyes: Methodological Reassessments of the Letter of Jude, 81-108. London: T&T Clark, 2008.
CHARLES, Robert Henry. The Book of Enoch or 1 Enoch. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1912.
CLASSEN, Carl Joachim. Rhetorical Criticism of the New Testament. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 2000.
COLLINS, John J. (ed.). Apocalypse: The Morphology of a Genre. Introduction: towards the morphology of a genre. United States of America: Society of Biblical Literature, vol. 14, n.01, 1979.
COLLINS, John J. A Imaginação Apocalíptica: Uma introdução à literatura apocalíptica judaica. São Paulo: Paulus, 2010.
CORBELL, Anthony. “Ciceronian Invective”. En: MAY, James M. (ed.). Brill’s Companion to Cicero: Oratory and Rhetoric, 23-48. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 2002.
CRADDOCK, Fred Brenning. First and Second Peter and Jude. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 1995.
DATES, Charlie. The Nexus of Emotion and Proclamation: Preaching should not be avoid of emotion. Disponível em: https://www.preachingtoday.com/skills/themes/emotions/nexus-of-emotion-and-proclamation.html. Acesso: 18/04/2023.
DAVIDS, Peter H. 2 Peter and Jude: A Handbook on the Greek Text. Waco, Texas: Baylor University Press, 2011.
DAVIDS, Peter H. A Theology of James, Peter and Jude: Living in the Light of the Coming King, Biblical Theology of the New Testament. Vol. 6. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2014.
DeSILVA, David Arthur. The Jewish Teachers of Jesus, James, and Jude: What Earliest Christianity Learned from the Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2012.
DONELSON, Lewis R. I & II Peter and Jude: A Commentary. Louisville: Westminster John Knox Press, 2010.
FUNK, Robert. A Greek Grammar of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1961.
GONZAGA, Waldecir. “A Sagrada Escritura, a alma da Sagrada Teologia”. En: MAZZAROLLO, Isidoro; FERNANDES, Leonardo Agostini; CORRÊA LIMA, Maria de Lourdes. Exegese, Teologia e Pastoral, relações, tensões e desafios, 201-235. Rio de Janeiro: PUC-Rio; Santo André: Academia Cristã, 2015.
GONZAGA, Waldecir. “As Cartas Católicas no Cânon do Novo Testamento”. Perspectiva Teológica, Belo Horizonte, MG, v. 49, n. 2, p. 421-444, mai./ago.2017. Doi: https://doi.org/10.20911/21768757v49n2p421/2017
GONZAGA, Waldecir. Compêndio do Cânon Bíblico. Listas bilíngues dos Catálogos Bíblicos. Antigo Testamento, NT e Apócrifos. Rio de Janeiro, EdiPUC-Rio; Petrópolis: Vozes, 2019.
GONZAGA, Waldecir; BENFICA BARAJA, Crespim Cabral. “O discipulado maduro na Epístola de Judas 20-23”. Pesquisas em Humanismo Solidário, Salvador, v. 3, n. 3, p. 80-112, jan./jun. 2023. Link: https://app.periodikos.com.br/article/647f2a96a95395749c35fce3/pdf/revistaphs-3-80.pdf
GOWLER, David B. “Socio-Rhetorical Interpretation: Textures of a Text and its Reception”. Journal for the Study of the New Testament, vol.2, n. 33, p. 191–206, 2010.
GREEN, Gene L. Jude and 2 Peter. Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2008.
HENZE, Matthias. Mind the Gap: How the Jewish Writings between the Old and New Testament Help Us Understand Jesus. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2017.
JOHNSON, Luke T. “The New Testament’s Anti-Jewish Slander and the Conventions of Ancient Polemic”. Journal of Biblical Literature, n., 01, vol. 108, p. 419–441, 1989.
KEATING, Daniel. First and Second Peter, Jude, Catholic Commentary on Sacred Scripture. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2011.
KENNEDY, George. A. New Testament Interpretation Through Rhetorical Criticism. Chapel Hill; Londres: The University of North Carolina Press, 1984.
LITFIN, Duane A. St. Paul’s Theology of Proclamation: 1 Corinthians 1-4 and Greco- Roman Rhetoric. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.
LOGOS. Socio-Rhetorical Commentary Series Collection, SRC (10 vols.). Disponível em: https://www.logos.com/product/41773/socio-rhetorical-commentary-series-collection-src?campaignid=18467616662&adgroupid=142254637385&keyword=&device=c&utm_source=google&utm_medium=advertising_cpc&utm_campaign=google_search-keyword_dsa_logos_row_en&gad_source=1&gclid=CjwKCAjw9IayBhBJEiwAVuc3fq0jM07t9Ha6JB2g225WJDNUTOnrOrZVTD9LgjUZRL_YGMzrtgVCSxoCPwkQAvD_BwE. Acesso em 13/05/2024.
MAY, David M. “Rhetorical Criticism”. En: BARRY, John. D. (ed.). Diccionario Bíblico Lexham. Disponível em: https://biblia.com/books/lbd/word/Rhetoric. Acesso em: 25/10/2024.
MBUVI, Andrew M. Jude and 2 Peter. Eugene: Cascade Books, 2015.
MENEZES e SILVA, Christiani Margareth de, “O papel das emoções na Retórica de Aristóteles”. AISTHE, vol. 1, n. 5, 106-114, 2010.
NESTLE-ALAND (eds.), Novum Testamentum Grace. Ed. XXVIII. Stuttgart: Deutsche Bibelgesellschaft, 2012.
OSBURN, Carroll D. “The Christological Use of 1 Enoch 1,9 in Jude 14,15”. New Testament Studies, vol. 23, n.3, p. 334-341, Abril, 1977.
PAINTER, John; DeSILVA, David Arthur. James and Jude. Paideia Commentaries on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2012.
PAROSCHI, Wilson. Origem e Transmissão do Texto do Novo Testamento. Barueri: SBB, 2012.
PATRICK, Dale; SCULT, Allen. (ed.). Rhetoric and Biblical interpretation. Journal for the study of the Old Testament Supplement Series, vol. 82, n.1, 1990.
PORTER, Stanley E., Handbook of Classical Rhetoric in the Hellenistic Period 330 B C. - A.D. 400. Leiden: Brill, 1997.
PORTER, Stanley E. Verbal Aspect in the Greek of the New Testament, with Reference to Tense and Mood: Studies in Biblical Greek. New York: Lang, 1989.
PREGEANT, Russell. Engaging the New Testament: Na Interdisciplinary Introduction. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1997.
QUINTILIANO, Marco Fábio. Instituição Oratória: Tomo I. Tradução de Bruno Fregni Bassetto. Campinas: Unicamp, 2015.
REESE, Ruth Anne. 2 Peter and Jude. The two horizons New Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2007.
ROBBINS, Vernon K. “Rhetoric and Culture: Exploring types of cultural Rhetoric in a text”. En: Stanley E. Porter y Thomas H. Olbricht (ed.). Rhetoric and the New Testament: Essays from the 1992 Heidelberg Conference, 443-463. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press, 1993.
ROBBINS, Vernon K. The Tapestry of Early Christian Discourse: Rhetoric, Society and ideology. Londres: Routledge, 1996.
ROBINSON, Alexandra Mileto. “The Enoch Inclusio in Jude: A New Structural Possibility”. Journal of Greco-Roman Christianity and Judaism. vol. 9, n.01, p. 196-212, 2013.
ROBINSON, Alexandra Mileto. Jude on the attack: A comparative analysis of the epistle of Jude, jewish judgments oracles and greco-roman invective. Londres: T&T Clark, 2017.
ROWSTON, Douglas J. “The Most Neglected Book in the New Testament”. New Testament Studies, vol. 21, n.1, p. 554–563, 1974.
SCHREINER, Thomas R. 1-2 Peter and Jude. The New American Commentary. Vol. 37. Nashville: B&H Publishing Group, 2003.
SILVA, Cássio Murilo Dias da. Metodologia de exegese bíblica: versão 2.0. 4 ed. rev.e atual. São Paulo: Paulinas, 2022.
STERN, David H. Jewish New Testament Commentary. Clarksville: Jewish New Testament Publications Inc., 1992.
THE ONLINE CRITICAL PSEUDEPIGRAPHA. 1 Enoch. Disponível em: https://pseudepigrapha.org/docs/text/1En. Acesso em: 01/05/2024.
WATSON, Duane F. “The Oral-Scribal and Cultural Intertexture of Apocalyptic Discourse in Jude and 2 Peter”. En: WATSON, Duane F. (ed.). The Intertexture of Apocalypse Discourse in The New Testament, 187-214. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature, 2002.
WATSON, Duane F.; HAUSER, Alan J. (ed.). Rhetorical Criticism of the Bible: A Comprehensive Bibliography with Notes on History and Method. Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1994.
WATSON, Duane F. Invention, Arrangement, and Style: Rhetorical Criticism of Jude and 2 Peter. New York: Society of Biblical Literature, 1988.
WEBB, Robert L. “The Eschatology of the Epistle of Jude and Its Rhetorical and Social Functions”. Bulletin for Biblical Research, vol. 6, n.01, p. 139-151, 1996.
WEGNER, Uwe. Exegese do Novo Testamento: manual de metodologia. 8ed. rev. e ampliada. São Leopoldo: Sinodal, 2016.
WEISS, Johannes. “Beiträge zur Paulinischen Rhetorik”. En: GREGORY, Caspar René. (ed.). Theologische Studien, 165-247. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, 1897.
WEISS, Johannes. Die Aufgaben der neutestamentlichen Wissenschaft in dem Gegenwart. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck und Ruprecht, 1908.
WILDER, Amos Niven. Early Christian Rhetoric: The Language of the Gospel. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1964.
WITHERINGTON III, Ben. “Almost thou persuadest me…: The importance of Greco- roman Rhetoric for the understanding of the text and context of the NT”. JETS, vol. N. 01, p. 63–88, 2015.
WITHERINGTON III, Ben. Conflict & Community in Corinth: A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary On 1 and 2 Corinthians. Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1995.
WITHERINGTON III, Ben. Letters and homilies for jewish christians: A Socio- Rhetorical Commentary on Hebrews, James and Jude. Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press Academic, 2016.
WITHERINGTON III, Ben. What’s in the Word: Rethinking the Socio-Rhetorical Character of the New Testament. Waco: Baylor University Press, 2009.
WITHERINGTON III, Ben; MYERS, Jason A. New Testament Rhetoric: An Introductory Guide to the Art of Persuasion in and of the New Testament. 2 ed. Eugene, Oregon: Cascade Books, 2022.
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2024 Revista Yachay
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
De acuerdo a la Ley 1322 de Derechos de Autor en Bolivia, la Revista YACHAY respeta los derechos morales de los autores, amparando la parternidad e integridad de sus obras publicadas.
